Although HHO gas has
more advantages over any other kind of
fuel alternative, Virgin Atlantic has become one of the first
airlines to
do a biofuel test flight. An indication that earth's biological
diversity will
be further impinged upon to our detriment.
One of the
airline’s 747 flew from Heathrow to Amsterdam
without passengers on board, ostensibly powered with a
new kind of
biofuel which
production is
claimed not to compete with food and drinking water resources. Sir
Richard
Branson CEO of Virgin thumping his chest said
about the median biofuel flight: “Flying
our 747 on bio-fuel 10 months earlier
than planned is a major breakthrough,”
The worry about the
claim of the advantages of this new biofuel
and its impact on agriculture and aquaculture is that the details of
the
bio-fuel are
currently secret. Word is
out that details will be made public next month. I hope they keep to
their
promise and that the details show that its
cheaper and cleaner
than HHO gas, which is
only a blend of water and gas, a hydrogen-on-demand alternative fuel
made by
your car or any engine as it runs.
HHO
GAS IS 3 TIMES MORE POTENT THAN GASOLINE!!! This is
becoming a trend for producing MPG's.
This
is a technology going back over 90 years!
However , authentic
information from
The Boeing Co. indicate that the test
flight, another of which will take place next month is a joint project
between
them, General electric Co. the manufacturers of the Jet engine and the
Virgin
Atlantic. It should be clear to you that big business is looking for a
way of
remaining in business, not a way of making life easier for you as does
HHO gas
technology.
Meanwhile Sir Richard Branson, quite upbeat
about the “clean
fuel” project says: “This breakthrough will help
Virgin Atlantic to fly its
planes using clean fuel sooner than expected. The demonstration flight
next
month will give us crucial knowledge that we can use to dramatically
reduce our
carbon footprint. Virgin Group pledged to invest all its profits from
its
transportation companies towards developing clean energy and with this
breakthrough we are well down the path to achieving our
goals.”
The bio-fuel in question is said not
to be ethanol, which is
credited to burn efficiently at altitudes
where it is feared that other biofuels may freeze. So one wonders what
it is. However, reports
from the BBC indicate
that while biofuels may play a role
in the reduction of
climate change, they
may create environmental problems unless
implemented with care. This view was credited to Britain’s
Royal Society.
This
same Society suggested in recently release report that current
EU and UK
policies are not really capable of reducing emissions and therefore
called for more
research into all aspects of biofuel production and use. But
ironically, no
mention was made of HHO gas. Even though this gas has the potential to
be the
real alternative fuel to help reduce and manage greenhouse gas
emissions from
fossil fuel burning.
The Society is urging the British government to
promote cutting-edge
and carbon-efficient technologies. It went as radical, in its report,
as
suggesting the use of financial incentives or penalties to make
companies
comply.
The irony of it all is that if the
citizens were encouraged
to embrace Water for gas for the production of hydrogen-on-demand HHO gas with their own cars, only
4 gallons of water
is enough to drive an average car in a whole year. This will neither
impact
negatively on water or food supply, but no effort is made towards
promoting HHO
gas because of obvious implications it will have on big business and
the world
economy as they see it. But just look at the table below to see how
using water
for gas benefits you.
The respected
Professor John Pickett of Rothamsted Research
institute, the chair of the Royal Society study, had this to say in
conclusion: “Biofuels
could play an
important role in cutting greenhouse gas emissions from transport, both
in Britain
and globally, but it would be disastrous if biofuel production made
further
inroads into biological diversity and natural ecosystems. We must not
create
new environmental or social problems in our efforts to deal with
climate
change.”
The
question I ask, therefore, is
why go to all this trouble of possibly endangering
us further with biofuel production
for blending with gas when the same is achievable with minimal quantity
of
water? A quart of water will make enough HHO gas to power a car for
months
without any harmful tail end emissions, because its end result is water.
All the above argument in favor of HHO gas has
been without
mentioning the amount of savings you will make saving on the cost of
gas at
this time when the prices are galloping like a crazy horse. It is huge
considering that your usage of gas will be reduced to the barest
minimum while achieving
smother, quieter and increased engine power and MPG gain of over 170%.
